11/7/14

This weekend's homework is to complete Assignment 16C based on today's experiment.

Assignment #16C - Investigating the Foods We Eat – Part 3

Procedure

Your tasks include the following:

·         State a hypothesis that you tested. Make sure that it was specific, clear, and measurable and supported by rationale.

·         Explain whether or not the data from your experiment supported or refuted the hypothesis.

·         Support this conclusion with specific evidence rooted in your observations.

Read this process twice for two separate hypotheses.

Criteria	4 (Mastery)	3 (Proficient)	2 (Approaching)	1 (Needs Revision)
Presents a clear and testable hypothesis that answers investigative question	Hypothesis concisely but clearly establishes a logical measureable relationship and/or prediction and supported with a logical rationale.	Hypothesis establishes a logical relationship and/or prediction but it may not be apparent how to measure one and supported with a logical rationale.	Hypothesis establishes a logical relationship and/or prediction OR the hypothesis may be illogical or contradictory to what we learn from class OR lacking a rationale.	Hypothesis does not discuss variables clearly, only implies a vague relationship/prediction and may be hypothesis may be illogical or contradictory to what we learn from class to what we discuss in class.
Identifies whether or not hypothesis is supported by data.	Specifically and correctly states if and to what degree the hypothesis is supported by the data, accounting for complexities and anomalies.	(NONE)	Incorrectly states whether or not the hypothesis is generally supported by the data  and/or does not discuss complexities – ex. data that does not fit trend.	Does not clearly state whether or not the hypothesis is supported by the data
Draws conclusions based on evidence	Correctly and clearly states a conclusion/relationship that is supported by specific and convincing evidence.	Correctly states a conclusion/relationship that is supported by specific and convincing evidence, but the connection could be more clear.	Correctly states a conclusion/relationship that is vague or is supported by vague evidence OR states an incorrect conclusion but with evidence as support.	States a conclusion/ relationship with little to no evidence to support it.

Class Data

	Food A	Food B	Food C
Fats/lipids	No stain	Stain	Stain
Protein	No color change	Purple	Purple
Simple sugars	No color change	No color change	No color change
Starches	Blue black color	Brown color	Brown color